What is Data Quality: Definition, Framework, and Best Practices
Table of Contents
Data quality standards are crucial to every business out there because they guarantee the accuracy of data-driven decisions made by teams every single day. Teams cannot rely on data to guide their decision-making processes when data quality is in question.
Poor data quality costs organizations an average of $12.9 million each year, according to Gartner. Luckily, we have data quality methods that limit the harmful impact of bad data. This is key because data quality opens the door to greater trust in data from data consumers. They can have confidence in the data and utilize it to improve decision-making, resulting in the development of new business strategies or the improvement of existing ones.
When a standard isn’t met for some reason, data quality solutions add value by assisting organizations in diagnosing underlying data issues. A root cause analysis enables teams to swiftly and efficiently address data quality issues.
How to maintain data quality is more than just a concern for day-to-day company operations – as companies integrate artificial intelligence (AI) and automation technologies into their workflows, high-quality data will be critical for the successful implementation of these tools. The classic adage “garbage in, garbage out” applies to machine learning and generative AI solutions as well.
What is data quality?
Data quality is a metric that assesses the state of data based on variables such as accuracy, completeness, consistency, reliability, and timeliness. Measuring data quality levels helps you identify data issues and determine whether your data is fit to serve its intended purpose.
As data processing has become more tightly integrated with business operations and businesses increasingly use data analytics to drive business decisions, the emphasis on data quality has increased as well.
Data quality management is an essential component of the overall data lifecycle management process (or master data management process), and efforts to improve data quality are often connected to data governance initiatives that guarantee data is formatted and used uniformly throughout an organization.
Data quality vs. data governance vs. data integrity
Data quality, data integrity, and data governance are all interconnected.
Data quality is a broad range of criteria used by businesses to assess the accuracy, completeness, validity, consistency, uniqueness, timeliness, and suitability for the purpose of their data. Poor data quality impacts the trust consumers have for data and so influences their decision-making process.
Data integrity is concerned with only a subset of these characteristics, namely accuracy, consistency, and completeness. It also looks at this from the perspective of data security, putting in place protections to avoid data corruption by malevolent actors. Data integrity also refers to the protection and safety of data in terms of regulatory compliance, such as GDPR compliance.
Data governance is the process of managing data availability, accessibility, integrity, and security in corporate systems using internal data standards and policies that also control data usage. Data governance guarantees that data is consistent and trustworthy and that it’s not misused in any way. Compliance with key regulations around customer data is one of the outcomes of data governance policies.
Key data quality dimensions
|Data quality dimension||Description|
|Timeliness||Data’s readiness within a certain time frame.|
|Completeness||The amount of usable or complete data, representative of a typical data sample.|
|Accuracy||Accuracy of the data values based on the agreed-upon source of truth.|
|Validity||How much data conforms to acceptable format for any business rules.|
|Consistency||Compares data records from two different datasets.|
|Uniqueness||Tracks the volume of duplicate data in a dataset.|
Quality is measured along a number of set data quality dimensions that should all be addressed by a data quality improvement process. They may vary depending on the data source:
This dimension refers to the data’s readiness within a certain time frame. A customer in an e-commerce store may expect to receive an order number immediately after making a purchase, so this data must be created in real-time.
This shows the amount of usable or complete data. If the data is not representative of a typical data sample, a significant percentage of missing values may result in a skewed or misleading analysis.
Accuracy refers to the accuracy of the data values based on the agreed-upon “source of truth.” Since numerous sources may report on the same measure, it’s critical that the company identify a primary data source for data accuracy. You can also use additional data sources to corroborate the primary one’s accuracy. To boost confidence in data accuracy, technologies can determine if each data source is moving in the same direction.
This dimension assesses how much data conforms to the acceptable format for any business rules. Metadata like valid data types, ranges, patterns, and so on are commonly included in formatting. Check out this article that dives into these two dimensions of data quality: Ways to Test Data Validity and Accuracy
This dimension compares data records from two different datasets to check for inconsistent data. As previously stated, many sources might be identified in order to report on a single statistic. Using many sources to look for consistent data trends and behavior allows companies to have confidence in any actionable insights derived from their investigations. The same reasoning can also be applied to data relationships. The number of employees in a department, for example, should not exceed the overall number of employees in a corporation.
The amount of duplicate data in a dataset is accounted for by uniqueness. Consider a machine learning model trained on millions of images. If the data set includes duplications, it will hurt both the efficiency of building a model and its accuracy. These metrics assist teams in conducting data quality reviews across their businesses in order to determine how relevant and usable the data is for a specific purpose.
Why is data quality management important at every stage of the data lifecycle?
Data quality management is there to build trust and confidence around data when it’s served to consumers via data analytics projects such as business intelligence dashboards, machine learning, and generative AI-based applications in health care and automotive, and many more.
Without a solid data management strategy and tooling, a business might suffer severe consequences from consumers making decisions based on poor quality data, be it managers running a business, drivers using self-driving functions, or doctors using machine learning to help them diagnose or treat patients.
Your company won’t get away with a simple data quality assessment framework. To properly measure data quality and keep it in check, you likely need several tools and processes working in conjunction to get the job done.
Where do you get started with data quality assessment, monitoring, and testing?
Here are the benefits teams get from ensuring data quality at every stage of the data lifecycle:
Also called data ingestion, data collection, or data entry. This point is about collecting customer data from multiple internal and external sources at the initial stage of the data lifecycle.
This is our most vulnerable spot from a quality perspective since, in most cases, we don’t own the source of the data. If something went wrong in the collection process before the data entered the data lake, we wouldn’t know. That is, unless we validate the data quality.
For example, data from operational systems may be wrong due to human error or late due to a malfunction in the system that stores it or saves it to the data lake. So, it’s critical to validate the quality of data and ensure that issues like inaccurate or inconsistent data don’t cascade into our ETLs.
Next comes data storage. At this point, many organizations fall into the trap of dispersing data across multiple teams and tools – a phenomenon called data silos.
When data is managed in silos and storage is distributed, consistency issues become the norm.
Once we move data to a single source of truth, we must validate the consistency of the data from the different sources and make sure to fix any consistency issues before the next stages of the lifecycle.
The next step is to prepare your data for use by curating, deduplicating, and doing other preprocessing required for the use of the data, depending on the application.
Since those preprocessing processes are meant to increase data quality and create data sets that can be adopted for analysis, we expect outcomes in terms of both data and metadata. We must validate that once the preprocessing is done, the data meets our expectations.
A best practice would be to validate each step in the data preprocessing – in some organizations, we might be talking about tens of such steps.
Machine learning, statistical modeling, artificial intelligence, data mining, and algorithms are some of the tools available at this stage. This is where we get the real value from the data that influences decision making and user satisfaction, improves our business, and provides value to our customers, no matter what vertical we are in or what type of data we analyze.
In this stage, we create and run data pipelines, and when we develop those pipelines for machine learning or business intelligence needs, we must be able to test the quality of those models during the development or improvement phases.
The deployment stage is where data validation, sharing, and utilization take place. If you leave data validation for this last stage – i.e., the process of verifying the accuracy, structure, and integrity of your data – prepare for trouble.
But if you have performed data quality validation at all stages of the data lifecycle, you still must have those tests here as well. We’re talking not just before deploying into production but also after it as a form of monitoring to ensure data stays of high quality while your analysis models are in production. Here we will test for model drift, dashboard health, etc.
Further data quality issues and how to avoid them
Data engineers and data scientists are working with more data than ever before and are struggling to keep data pipelines in good shape due to outdated work methods.
Here are a few difficulties that most data engineers and data scientists are dealing with today:
Validating data quality and consistency before it enters a data lake is difficult. That is because, unlike software developers, data practitioners do not have data staging or QA environments. Everything, including potential problems, gets washed into the lake – and engineers need to find a way to deal with it.
Testing and troubleshooting new data sets
Whether in pre-production, deployment, or final quality assurance before reaching end consumers, this one is tough. It’s all because data doesn’t have its own specific testing environment, and everything eventually ends up in one data lake.
Many other problems come to light during troubleshooting because data engineers lack an effective method for detecting, analyzing, and debugging production data quality issues.
Lack of automation
Data engineering entails a lot of manual labor and heavy lifting in distributed computation systems. Unlike software developers, data engineers don’t have access to a large range of automation tools that allow CI/CD for the data and, by doing so, remove low-level manual work and eliminate errors.
Not to mention the hefty cost of making a mistake, which frequently prevents organizations from advancing in their data-driven journey as fast as they would like.
Improving data quality: 3 best practices
|Best practice||Quick overview|
|Data validation||Verifying the data itself to validate its distribution, variance, or features, as well as validating the schema or format.|
|Metadata validation||The best practices and standards apply to data and its metadata.|
|Real-time data validation||Ingest data into a distinct branch that data consumers can’t see, test the data on the branch, and merge it if it passes the tests.|
1. Data validation
It’s inevitable that, as data engineers and data scientists, we make assumptions about the data that we’ll be using. It doesn’t matter if it’s the most current data from an existing data set or a completely new data set.
We may have made assumptions about the completeness, timeliness, distribution, variance, or coverage of a problem space we are looking to build a model for. Whatever our assumptions are, if they don’t hold, we will face poor results at the other end of our calculation.
To ensure that the data is reliable, we should put it to the test to determine if it supports our assumptions. Validation tests are a key part of data quality testing and include verifying the data itself to validate its distribution, variance, features, or any other assumption we made, to make sure it holds.
2. Metadata validation
We’ve already talked about data, but let’s not forget about metadata! Metadata is data that describes data. This includes data types, data schema, file formats and metadata they may hold, and more.
For example, if the data is a table, the metadata may include the schema, which includes the number of columns as well as the name and type of variable in each column. If the data is stored in a file, the metadata may include the file type as well as other descriptive characteristics such as version, configuration, and compression method.
The test description is straightforward. The best practices and standards that the organization must adhere to have expectations for each value of the metadata they produce.
If you’re a software developer, this type of test is quite similar to unit testing a piece of code. Creating tests may take some time, but obtaining high test coverage is both achievable and recommended.
It’s also required to maintain running the tests whenever the metadata changes. Expectations here get frequently misaligned. While we’re used to upgrading unit tests as we update the code, we must be prepared to dedicate the same amount of time and effort to maintaining metadata validation as our schemas evolve.
3. Data integration in real time
How can data practitioners achieve high-quality data during intake? One practice is to ingest data into a distinct branch that data consumers can’t see. This allows you to test the data on the branch and only merge it if the tests pass. And naturally, this calls for data versioning.
To automate the procedure, teams can set up a series of pre-merge hooks that trigger data validation tests. The changes will only be merged into the lake’s master branch if the tests pass. If a test fails, the testing solution should notify the monitoring system and provide a link to crucial validation test failure details.
Because the data repository was committed to the ingestion branch, the newly ingested data has a snapshot of it. This makes determining the source of the problem simple.
Prior to data input, this technique allows for data quality validation checks to be done. All in all, testing data before it is ingested into the master branch will avoid quality concerns.
Quick overview of data quality management tools and how to choose one
Here’s an overview of various data quality tools and testing frameworks that bring teams one step closer to high-quality data.
This open-source validation tool is simple to incorporate into your ETL code. Data can be tested using a SQL or file interface. Because it was created as a logging system, it can be used in conjunction with a documentation format to generate automatic documentation from the stated tests. It also allows you to create a data profile and set expectations that you may discuss during testing for effective data quality management.
AWS has developed an open-source tool to help developers establish and maintain metadata validation. Deequ is an Apache Spark-based framework for creating “unit tests for data,” which examine the quality of data in large datasets. Deequ is intended to work with tabular data, such as CSV files, database tables, logs, and flattened JSON files – basically, anything that fits into a Spark data frame.
This is a framework for implementing observability (one of the key data quality measures) without requiring any code. It uses machine learning to infer and comprehend the appearance of your data, proactively find data issues, analyze their consequences, and send warnings via links with conventional operational systems. It also allows for the exploration of underlying causes.
Anomalo helps teams to stay ahead of data issues by automatically detecting them as soon as they occur in the data and before they affect anybody else. Data practitioners can connect Anomalo to their data warehouses and immediately start monitoring the tables they care about. The ML-powered tool can understand the historical structure and trends of the data automatically, alerting users to many concerns without the need to define rules or set thresholds.
Lightup lets data practitioners easily install and scale prebuilt data quality checks on massive volumes of data. Deep data quality checks can be deployed in minutes, not months. The solution also lets teams scale data quality tests across enterprise data pipelines quickly and efficiently using time-bound pushdown queries – without sacrificing performance. Plus, there’s an AI engine that can automatically monitor and detect data irregularities.
Bigeye monitors the health and quality of data pipelines, so teams never have to wonder if their data is reliable. Global data pipeline health and extensive data quality monitoring ensure data quality and anomaly detection technology shows issues before they disrupt the business. The tool also comes with lineage-driven root cause and effect analysis for quick insight into the roots of problems and a clear path to solutions.
Enforcing data quality with data version control
A lot of data quality problems arise from issues related to the unique ways in which data practitioners work – and the lack of tooling at their disposal.
Take a look at a typical software development team. Team members can contribute to the same repository without any misunderstandings. Different users can use different versions of the software at the same time, but developers can quickly replicate a user problem by utilizing the same version that a given user was using when they reported the problem.
Bringing the same capabilities to the data world is the goal of data version control tools. Managing data in the same manner you manage code increases the efficiency of many data operations jobs:
Data branching and versioning
When there are several versions of data, the version history is quite evident from a lineage standpoint. Engineers can simply track changes to their repositories or datasets and point consumers to newly available data.
Isolating your work
When bringing updates or corrections to existing data pipelines, these changes must be evaluated to ensure that they actually improve the data quality and do not introduce new mistakes. To do so, data engineers must be able to design and test these modifications in isolation before they become part of production data.
If you expose users to production data and something goes wrong, you can always roll back to a previous version in a single atomic operation. Eventually, this improves consumer trust in the data you deliver thanks to the good data quality.
Suppose a problem with data quality causes a decline in performance or an increase in infrastructure expenditures. If you have versioning, you can open a branch of the lake from the point where the changes were put into production.
Using the information, you can duplicate all of the environment’s aspects as well as the problem itself to begin determining what’s wrong.
Version control systems allow you to configure actions to be triggered when particular events occur. A webhook, for example, can verify a new file to determine if it matches one of the authorized data types.
Using a data version control platform eliminates the issues that plague large data engineering teams working on the same data. When an issue emerges, troubleshooting is substantially faster and helps everyone to focus on increasing data quality.
Data quality management calls for the right process and tooling
The reliability of your data lake will be determined by the data quality of everything you add there. High quality data and services are born already in the ingestion process, calling for constant testing of newly imported data to ensure that it fulfills data quality criteria.
Even though hosting your data lake on object storage provides advantages in terms of scalability and performance, it’s still difficult to follow best practices and ensure excellent data quality. In this situation, how do you maintain data quality? The only hope is to include automation in the mix.
Continuous integration and continuous data deployment are automated processes that rely on the capacity to detect and prevent data mistakes from moving into production. You can build this functionality using a variety of open-source solutions and move towards good data quality faster.
lakeFS is one of them. It includes zero-copy isolation, pre-commit, and pre-merge hooks to help with the automated process. That way, lakeFS provides the solution to testing data quality technologies in line with the best practices discussed above.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents