lakeFS Acquires DVC, Uniting Data Version Control Pioneers to Accelerate AI-Ready Data
6 Data Quality Dimensions: What They Are & How to Measure
Table of Contents
According to Gartner, poor data quality costs enterprises an average of $12.9 million every year. When data quality becomes a concern, customers may lose trust in data and refrain from using it to drive their decision-making processes.
In my experience, maintaining data quality is more than just an issue for day-to-day business operations; as businesses incorporate more artificial intelligence (AI) and automation technologies into their workflows, high-quality data will be vital for the effective adoption of these tools. The old phrase “garbage in, garbage out” applies equally to machine learning and generative AI solutions.
What data quality dimensions can data teams follow during data quality assessment? Keep reading to learn about data quality dimensions and how to ensure robust data quality monitoring.
Key Takeaways
- Six core dimensions define data quality: Accuracy, completeness, consistency, validity, timeliness, and uniqueness are the foundational criteria used to assess whether data is fit for its intended purpose.
- Quality must be monitored across the full data lifecycle: Data quality should be evaluated during collection, storage, processing, evaluation, and application to reduce the impact of early-stage data flaws.
- Automated testing is essential for production-grade quality: Embedding validation rules and data quality checks directly into pipelines enables early detection of anomalies, schema drift, or integrity failures.
- Dashboards, rules, and metadata validation support measurement: Tools like real-time dashboards, rule-based validations, and metadata testing help quantify and monitor adherence to data quality standards.
- lakeFS enables automated quality gates via version control: With features like hooks for pre-commit and pre-merge, lakeFS supports automated enforcement of data quality thresholds during CI/CD processes.
What Are Data Quality Dimensions?
Data quality dimensions are features that can be evaluated or analyzed against a set of criteria to determine data quality. Measuring data quality dimensions helps identify data problems and determine whether data is appropriate to serve its intended purpose. The six dimensions of data quality are accuracy, completeness, integrity, validity, timeliness, and uniqueness.
Data quality management is an important part of the overall data lifecycle, also known as master data management, and efforts to improve data quality are often linked to data governance initiatives that ensure data is formatted and used consistently across an organization.
6 Data Quality Dimensions You Need to Use
| Data quality dimension | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Timeliness | Data’s readiness within a certain time frame. | A weather app updates its forecast every hour. If the data is delayed by 6 hours, users may make poor decisions based on outdated information. |
| Completeness | The amount of usable or complete data, representative of a typical data sample. | A customer database includes names and email addresses, but 30% of entries are missing phone numbers, making it harder to follow up with clients. |
| Accuracy | Accuracy of the data values based on the agreed-upon source of truth. | A GPS system shows a restaurant’s location 2 blocks away from its actual address, leading users to the wrong place. |
| Validity | How much data conforms to acceptable format for any business rules. | A form asks for a birthdate, but someone enters “February 30”—which isn’t a real date. The system should reject it as invalid. |
| Consistency | Compares data records from two different datasets. | A product’s price is listed as €19.99 on the website but €24.99 in the mobile app. This inconsistency confuses customers and erodes trust. |
| Uniqueness | Tracks the volume of duplicate data in a dataset. | A patient record system has two entries for the same person with identical details. Duplicate records can cause medical errors or billing issues. |
How do you rate the quality of your data? Use these six data quality dimensions:
1. Completeness
Data is termed “complete” when it meets comprehensiveness criteria. Imagine that you ask the consumer to provide their name. You may make a customer’s middle name optional, but the data is full as long as you have the first and last name.
There are things you can do to improve this aspect of data quality. You should determine whether all of the necessary information is available and whether any pieces are missing.
2. Accuracy
This is a key one among dimensions of data quality because it indicates accuracy – how well information represents an event or thing depicted. For example, if a consumer is 32 years of age but the system thinks they are 34, the system’s information is incorrect.
What can you do to enhance your accuracy? Consider if the data accurately depicts the situation. Is there any inaccurate data that should be corrected?
3. Consistency
The same data may be maintained in several locations at many businesses. If that information matches, it’s said to be “consistent.” Consistency is a data quality dimension that plays a key role especially in environments with multiple data sources.
For example, if your human resources information systems indicate that an employee no longer works there but your payroll system indicates that they’re still receiving a paycheck, your data is inconsistent.
To tackle inconsistency concerns, examine your data sets to check if they are the same in every occurrence. Is there any evidence that the data contradicts itself?
4. Validity
Data validity is an attribute that shows the degree to which data meets business standards or conforms to a specified format. Birthdays are a common example: many systems require you to input your birthdate in a specified format. If you fail to do that, the data will be invalid.
To achieve this data quality dimension, you must ensure that all of your data adheres to a certain format or set of business standards.
5. Uniqueness
“Unique” data is data that appears just once in a database. Data duplication is a common occurrence, as we all know. For example, it’s possible that “Daniel A. Lawson” and “Dan A. Lawson” are the same person – but in your database, they’ll be treated as unique entries.
Meeting this data quality dimension entails examining your data to ensure that it is not duplicated.
6. Timeliness
Is your data readily available when it is required? This data quality metric is known as “timeliness.” Assume you want financial data every quarter; if the data is available when it should be, it can be considered timely.
The timeliness component of data quality relates to specific user expectations. If your data isn’t available when you need it, it does not meet that dimension.
Expert Tip: Measure Data Quality Dimensions Effectively
Oz Katz is the CTO and Co-founder of lakeFS, an open source platform that delivers resilience and manageability to object-storage based data lakes. Oz engineered and maintained petabyte-scale data infrastructure at analytics giant SmilarWeb, which he joined after the acquisition of Swayy.
To measure data quality dimensions accurately, consider the following steps:
- Define Clear Thresholds: Establish explicit definitions for each dimension (e.g., what counts as complete, timely, or accurate) aligned with business needs.
- Use Automated Profiling Tools: Scan datasets for anomalies, missing values, and format violations to catch issues early.
- Apply Rule-Based Validations: Tie validations to domain logic to ensure data makes sense in context.
- Embed Checks into Pipelines: Integrate quality checks directly into data pipelines so monitoring is continuous, not just at ingestion.
- Incorporate Stakeholder Feedback: Regular input from business users helps refine metrics and ensures relevance.
- Conduct Regular Audits: Periodic reviews keep definitions, thresholds, and monitoring aligned with evolving goals.
When and Where to Test Data Quality
| When to Test Data Quality | |
|---|---|
| During development | Run unit tests on new data sources to check for primary key uniqueness, non-null constraints, duplicate rows, and column-level assumptions. |
| During transformation | Validate row counts, join logic, and metric calculations to ensure transformations preserve integrity and meet business expectations. |
| In production | Automate recurring tests using orchestration tools (e.g. Airflow, GitLab CI/CD) to detect schema changes, freshness issues, or logic failures in real time. |
Before asking about “how,” it’s important to consider “when.” When should you test data quality, and how do data quality dimensions come into play?
Needless to say, data quality testing needs to take place throughout the entire data lifecycle – from ingestion to transformations, testing, deployment, monitoring, and debugging.
Data Quality Testing During Development
It’s a good practice to test new data transformations for new data sources and business entities throughout the development cycle to ensure high data quality.
Testing the original quality of your data is a smart practice. This is where it pays to carry out the following tests:
- Primary key uniqueness and non-nullness
- Column values that satisfy basic assumptions
- Rows with duplicates
Consider using source freshness checks to ensure that source data is being updated on a frequent basis by an ETL tool.
Data Quality Testing During Transformation
A lot of mistakes can happen when you clean, aggregate, combine, and apply business logic to raw data – all the white weaving in additional data manipulations and generating new metrics and dimensions with SQL and Python.
This is the time to measure data quality and check if:
- The primary keys are unique and non-null.
- The row counts are correct.
- Joins don’t create duplicate rows.
- Your expectations are realized via the interactions between upstream and downstream dependents.
Data Quality Testing During Pull Requests
It’s a good idea to do data quality testing during pull requests before implementing data transformation changes into your analytics code base. Contextualized test success/failure results aid in code review and act as a final check before integrating the code into production.
In practice, you’ll be testing a GitHub pull request with a snapshot of the data transformation code.
You can invite additional data team members to contribute if you use a Git-based data transformation tool. Others may help you resolve mistakes and establish a high-quality analytics foundation by reviewing your code updates.
Make sure that no new data models or transformation code enter your code base without first being reviewed and tested against your standards by your team.
Data Quality Testing in Production
Once your data transformations and tests have been included in your main production branch, it’s critical that you run them on a frequent basis to ensure excellent data quality.
That’s because many things might happen to your data model. For example, a software engineer may implement a new feature that modifies your source data, or a business user may add a new field to the ERP system, causing the business logic of your data transformation to fail.
Your ETL pipeline might wind up dumping duplicate or missing data into your warehouse, for example.
This is when automated testing comes in handy. It enables you to be the first to discover when anything unusual occurs in your business or data. Airflow, automation servers such as GitLab CI/CD or CodeBuild, and cron job scheduling are all typical techniques for running data tests in production.
Ensuring Data Quality and Integrity
| When should we test data quality? | Why? |
|---|---|
| Data collection | Data from operational systems may be incorrect owing to human error or late due to a fault in the system that stores or saves it to the data lake. |
| Storage | Consistency issues become the norm when data is managed in silos and storage is spread. |
| Processing | We must ensure that the data satisfies our expectations after preprocessing. |
| Evaluation | This is where you obtain the true value from the data that drives decision making. |
| Application | Quality monitoring guarantees data quality remains good while your analytic models are in production. |
When data is sent to teams through data analytics projects like business intelligence dashboards, machine learning, and generative AI-based apps, data quality management helps to build trust and confidence among customers.
A business may suffer severe consequences if consumers make decisions based on poor quality data, whether it’s managers running a business, drivers using self-driving functions, or doctors using machine learning to help them diagnose or treat patients.
A basic data quality evaluation strategy won’t be enough for your company. To correctly test and maintain data quality using data quality tools, you will most likely require numerous tools and procedures to function in tandem.
How do you begin assessing, monitoring, and evaluating data quality dimensions? The following are the advantages that teams gain from guaranteeing data quality at all stages of the data lifecycle:
1. Data Collection
Data ingestion, collection, and data input basically denote the same thing. At the beginning of the data lifecycle, you acquire consumer data from different internal and external sources.
This is the most susceptible point in terms of quality since, in most circumstances, teams don’t own the sources of this data. You wouldn’t know if something went wrong during the gathering procedure before the data entered the data lake. Unless, of course, we confirm the data quality.
Data from operational systems, for example, may be incorrect owing to human error or late due to a fault in the system that stores or saves it to the data lake. As a result, it’s vital to evaluate data quality and ensure that data quality issues such as erroneous or inconsistent data don’t cascade into your ETLs.
2. Storage
The following step is data storage. Many businesses are already falling into the trap of spreading data among numerous teams and platforms, a phenomenon known as data silos.
Consistency difficulties become the norm when data is managed in silos and storage is spread. That’s why measuring data quality dimensions here is a smart move.
Once we have moved data to a single source of truth, we must test the consistency of the data from the various sources and ensure that any consistency concerns are resolved before moving on to the next phases of the lifecycle.
3. Processing
The next stage is to prepare your data for usage by curating, deduplicating, and performing any other preprocessing necessary by the application. There’s space for data quality assessment at this stage too.
Since such preprocessing operations are intended to improve data quality and provide data sets suitable for analysis, we anticipate outcomes in terms of both data and metadata. We must ensure that the data satisfies our expectations after preprocessing.
An ideal practice would be to validate each stage of data preparation – in some businesses, this may be tens of processes.
4. Evaluation
At this time, some of the techniques available include machine learning, statistical modeling, artificial intelligence, data mining, and algorithms.
No matter which vertical you’re in or what sort of data you analyze, this is where you obtain the true value from the data that drives decision making, improves business outcomes, and delivers value to data consumers.
We design and execute data pipelines at this point, and when we develop those pipelines for machine learning or business intelligence purposes, we must be able to assess the quality of data and models throughout the development or improvement phases. This is where we need to assess data using data quality dimensions.
5. Application
Data validation, exchange, and use occur during the deployment stage. Prepare for disaster if you leave data validation to the end, i.e., the process of confirming the accuracy, structure, and integrity of your data.
However, if you’ve completed data quality validation at all phases of the data lifecycle, you must still include those tests here. We’re not only talking about before deployment into production but also afterwards – as a type of monitoring to guarantee data quality remains good while your analytic models are in production.
How to Measure Data Quality Dimensions
| Data quality dimension | How to measure |
|---|---|
| Timeliness | Compare data capture time to the required time window. Measure data latency (e.g., time between event and data availability). Track frequency of updates versus expected update schedule. |
| Completeness | Calculate percentage of missing values in required fields. Check for presence of all expected records or entities. Validate that all mandatory fields are populated. |
| Accuracy | Compare data values against trusted sources or ground truth. Use sampling and validation rules to detect errors. Measure error rates or deviations from expected values. |
| Validity | Check if data conforms to defined formats, types, and ranges. Apply business rules to verify logical correctness. Count violations of schema or domain constraints. |
| Consistency | Compare values across related datasets or systems for alignment. Detect conflicting entries for the same entity. Monitor synchronization between integrated data sources. |
| Uniqueness | Identify duplicate records or entries. Count repeated values in fields meant to be unique (e.g., IDs). Use matching algorithms to detect near-duplicates. |
Tools and Frameworks for Managing Data Quality Dimensions
Data Quality Dashboards
Data quality dashboards are visual tools that provide real-time insights into the health and reliability of data across systems. They allow data teams to monitor trends, detect anomalies, and prioritize remediation efforts. By consolidating test results, alerts, and historical performance into a single interface, dashboards empower stakeholders to make informed decisions and maintain trust in their data assets.
Data Quality Rules and Metrics
Data quality rules are predefined conditions that data must meet to be considered reliable, while metrics quantify how well the data adhere to those rules. For example, a rule may state that all customer records must have a valid email format, and the corresponding metric would measure the percentage of records that comply.
These rules can be tailored to business logic, regulatory requirements, or technical constraints and are essential for validating data during ingestion, transformation, and analysis. Metrics derived from such rules help organizations benchmark performance, track improvements, and identify areas of concern.
ISO Standards for Data Quality
ISO standards for data quality provide a structured framework for evaluating and managing data quality across dimensions such as accuracy, completeness, consistency, and credibility. These standards define characteristics of high-quality data and offer guidance on how to assess and improve it within various contexts, including software systems, business processes, and data governance programs.
By aligning with ISO standards, organizations can ensure that their data practices meet international benchmarks, support interoperability, and foster trust among users, partners, and regulators.
Metadata Testing for Validation
Metadata is data that describes data rather than data itself.
For instance, if the data is a table, as is frequently the case in analytics, the metadata may include the schema, such as the number of columns and the name and type of variable in each column. If the data is in a file, the metadata may include the file format and other descriptive features such as version, configuration, and compression method.
The definition of metadata testing is relatively straightforward:
- There is an expectation for each value of metadata that is generated from the organization’s best practices and the standards it must follow.
- This form of testing is quite similar to unit testing a piece of code if you’re a software developer. As with unit test coverage, creating all of those tests may take some time, but achieving high test coverage is both doable and recommended.
- It’s also key to keep the tests running whenever the metadata changes. Data quality expectations are frequently out of sync.
While we’re accustomed to upgrading unit tests when we modify the code, we must be prepared to devote the same time and care to maintaining metadata validation as our schemas expand. Metadata testing needs to be part of our overall data quality assessment framework.
Common Challenges with Data Quality Dimensions
Data Silos and Inconsistencies
When data is stored in isolated systems across departments or platforms, it becomes difficult to maintain a unified view. This fragmentation often leads to conflicting information, duplicated efforts, and poor decision-making.
Example: A bank’s marketing team uses one CRM system while the customer service team uses another. Consequently, one system updates a customer’s contact preferences without reflecting them in the other, resulting in unwanted calls and frustrated clients.
Duplicate and Missing Data
Duplicate records inflate datasets and skew analytics, while missing data can prevent key insights or cause systems to fail. Both issues undermine trust and reliability in data-driven processes.
Example: An online retailer’s database contains multiple entries for the same customer due to slight variations in name spelling. Meanwhile, some orders lack shipping addresses, causing delays and customer complaints.
Timeliness and Real-Time Data Issues
Delayed or outdated data can lead to missed opportunities, poor user experiences, or incorrect decisions, especially in fast-moving environments where timing is critical.
Example: A stock trading app receives price updates with a 10-minute lag. Users make trades based on stale data, resulting in financial losses and eroding confidence in the platform.
Conclusion: Data Quality Dimensions Are Indispensable for Data Teams
The quality of the data you contribute to your data lake will influence its reliability, and poor data quality quickly becomes a serious risk to business operations. High-quality data and services are created during the ingestion process, calling for continuous testing of freshly imported data to verify that it meets data quality requirements.
How do you ensure data quality? The only hope is to include an automation solution in your data quality tools. Continuous integration and continuous data deployment are automated procedures that rely on the ability to detect and prevent data errors from reaching the production environment. Building this feature with a range of open-source alternatives can quickly achieve high data quality.
One of them is the open-source data versioning tool lakeFS. It offers hooks for zero-copy isolation, pre-commit, and pre-merge to aid in the automated process. As a result, lakeFS provides teams with a solution for evaluating data quality technologies in accordance with the best practices outlined above.
Frequently Asked Questions
A data quality framework is a structured approach for assessing, managing, and improving data on key dimensions such as accuracy, completeness, and consistency.
Data quality rules are specific conditions or constraints that data must meet to be considered valid, reliable, and fit for use.
The ISO/IEC 25012 standard defines a comprehensive model for evaluating data quality based on characteristics such as accuracy, completeness, and credibility.
Data quality refers to how well data meets user needs across multiple dimensions, while data integrity focuses on the correctness and trustworthiness of data over its lifecycle.
A data quality index is a composite score that quantifies overall data health by aggregating metrics from various quality dimensions like timeliness, validity, and uniqueness.
Poor data quality can lead to flawed decision-making, regulatory penalties, customer dissatisfaction, and financial losses.
Table of Contents